MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803256605 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2017-0346

Molecular cloning and induced expression of the plasma membrane intrinsic protein gene and promoter from mulberry (<i>Morus multicaulis</i>)

2018· article· en· W2803256605 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heng Wang, Zhou Hong, Ackon Justice Afriyie, Dominic Kwame Kotoka, Rongfang Li, Renjie Sun, Long Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneBiologyCloning (programming)Abiotic stressGeneticsMolecular cloningTranscription factorHomology (biology)Molecular biologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To isolate the plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2 (PIP2) gene and its promoter from mulberry (Morus multicaulis), and to analyse its expression under stress conditions using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis, the mulberry MmPIP2 gene was cloned and sequenced. The putative MmPIP2 protein was 282 amino acids long and contained Asn–Pro–Ala signature motifs. Phylogenetic analysis showed that MmPIP2 is highly conserved, exhibiting strong homology with other plant PIP2s. The 5′ flanking sequence was cloned by genome walking and numerous transcription factor binding sites were identified. qRT-PCR revealed that the expression levels of MmPIP2 differed with changes in abiotic stress, indicating that PIP2 is a multifunctional molecule in mulberry. Studying the molecular mechanisms behind adaptations to stress and strengthening stress tolerance in plants are of fundamental importance to mulberry production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207