MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803271863 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.10888

Numerical Simulations to the Vlasov-Poisson System with a Strong Magnetic Field

2018· preprint· en· W2803271863 on OpenAlexaff
Francis Filbet, Chang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersEuropean CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEUROfusion
KeywordsMagnetic fieldPoisson distributionPhysicsComputer simulationScheme (mathematics)Statistical physicsVlasov equationKinetic energyPoisson's equationField (mathematics)Classical mechanicsPlasmaApplied mathematicsMathematicsMathematical analysisMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an efficient Particle-In-Cell algorithm for the simulation of the three dimensional Vlasov-Poisson system in the presence of a strong external magnetic field. When the intensity of the magnetic field is sufficiently large and for any time step, the numerical scheme provides formally a consistent approximation of the drift-kinetic model, which corresponds to the asymptotic model. Numerical results show that this new Particle-In-Cell method is efficient and accurate large time steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207