Bibliographic record
Abstract
« Le Roi-grenouille » constitue ce que la critique anglo-saxonne désigne sous le terme de « crossover », c’est-à-dire un texte adressé à la fois aux adultes et aux enfants. Si ce conte troublant, voire dérangeant, est souvent tronqué, expurgé ou réécrit avant de l’offrir aux enfants, un nombre croissant d’illustrateurs présente une version non aseptisée dans des livres destinés à un public mixte d’enfants et d’adultes. Maurice Sendak, qui n’a jamais cessé de mettre en question la frontière entre littérature adulte et littérature jeunesse, inclut « Le Roi Grenouille » dans son recueil de contes des Grimm publié en 1973. L’auteur de cet article examine les interprétations visuelles du « Roi-Grenouille » créées par des illustrateurs de divers pays qui, comme Sendak, croient que ce conte appartient à tous les âges. Mots clés: « Le Roi grenouille », conte, «crossover», double public d’enfants et d’adultes, illustration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".