MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803389985 · doi:10.1002/ldr.3016

Promoting the use of isotopic techniques to combat soil erosion: An overview of the key role played by the <scp>SWMCN Subprogramme</scp> of the <scp>Joint FAO/IAEA Division</scp> over the last 20 years

2018· article· en· W2803389985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLand Degradation and Development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en Agroenvironnement
FundersInternational Atomic Energy Agency
KeywordsAgricultureFood securityWork (physics)BusinessEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningAgency (philosophy)Environmental protectionEnvironmental economicsEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), through the Joint Division with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, assists its Member States in applying nuclear techniques to alleviate challenges in food safety, food security and sustainable agricultural development. The Soil and Water Management &amp; Crop Nutrition (SWMCN) Subprogramme, within the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, has made significant contributions to the development of isotopic techniques for the assessment of soil degradation and the development of efficient soil and land conservation approaches. These techniques include fallout radionuclides such as 137 Cs, 210 Pb ex , 7 Be, and 239+240 Pu as well as 13 C stable isotope and compound‐specific stable isotope analyses. These methodologies were developed and/or refined through the work of researchers from developed and developing countries who were selected to work within the frame of IAEA's Coordinated Research Projects (CRPs). Internal research activities implemented in the Joint FAO/IAEA's SWMCN Laboratory in Seibersdorf supported the work accomplished in the CRPs. The methodologies thus developed have been subsequently disseminated to developing countries by IAEA's Technical Cooperation Programme to assist Member States to adopt climate‐smart agriculture and reduce soil degradation that poses a threat to food security and the environment. This review paper provides an overview of the activities conducted in the frame of CRPs for combating soil erosion over the last 20 years and highlights the major achievements. Examples of the success and the impact obtained in Morocco, Madagascar, and Vietnam in using these isotopic techniques are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it