MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803419220 · doi:10.21105/joss.00745

The Vascular Modeling Toolkit: A Python Library for the Analysis of Tubular Structures in Medical Images

2018· article· en· W2803419220 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Izzo, David A. Steinman, Simone Manini, Luca Antiga

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceOpen sourceSoftwareProgramming languageComputer graphics (images)Software engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Izzo et al., (2018). The Vascular Modeling Toolkit: A Python Library for the Analysis of Tubular Structures in Medical Images. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(25), 745, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00745

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207