MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803447108 · doi:10.1137/16m1107991

Three-Dimensional Full Euler Flows with Nontrivial Swirl in Axisymmetric Nozzles

2018· article· en· W2803447108 on OpenAlexaff
Xue-Mei Deng, Tian-Yi Wang, Wei Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsMathematicsEuler equationsCompressibilityRotational symmetryEuler's formulaFlow (mathematics)Euler systemPiecewiseLimit (mathematics)Mathematical analysisVorticityNozzleIncompressible flowVortexGeometryMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are concerned with the unique existence of three-dimensional steady compressible full Euler flows through arbitrary infinitely long axisymmetric and piecewise smooth nozzles with nontrivial swirl. We develop a new approach to prove the nondegeneracy of the axial velocity based on the observation of the potential flow. A modified argument is also employed to handle the stagnation at the corner points. It is the first result on the three-dimensional compressible Euler flow with more than one nonzero and large vorticity. In order to show it, one new stream-conserved quantity is constructed. Finally, the minimum flux limits and the incompressible limits are considered. Via the incompressible limit, we also establish the unique existence of incompressible Euler flows with nontrivial swirl. The methods and techniques developed in this paper are also helpful to other related problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Mathematical AnalysisSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207