MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803456291 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.013

Plasma Circulating Extracellular RNAs in Left Ventricular Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction

2018· article· en· W2803456291 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsty Danielson, Ravi V. Shah, Ashish Yeri, Xiao‐Jun Liu, Fernando Camacho Garcia, Michael G. Silverman, Kahraman Tanrıverdi, Avash Das, Chunyang Xiao, Michael Jerosch‐Herold, Bobak Heydari, Siddique Abbasi, Kendall Van Keuren‐Jensen, Jane E. Freedman, Yaoyu E. Wang, Anthony Rosenzweig, Raymond Y. Kwong, Saumya Das

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCommon FundNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Historical AssociationNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsMyocardial infarctionVentricular remodelingFibrosismicroRNAMedicineEjection fractionMicrovesiclesInternal medicineDownregulation and upregulationInflammationCardiologyMyocardial fibrosisCardiac fibrosisHeart failureBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite substantial declines in mortality following myocardial infarction (MI), subsequent left ventricular remodeling (LVRm) remains a significant long-term complication. Extracellular small non-coding RNAs (exRNAs) have been associated with cardiac inflammation and fibrosis and we hypothesized that they are associated with post-MI LVRm phenotypes. RNA sequencing of exRNAs was performed on plasma samples from patients with "beneficial" (decrease LVESVI ≥ 20%, n = 11) and "adverse" (increase LVESVI ≥ 15%, n = 11) LVRm. Selected differentially expressed exRNAs were validated by RT-qPCR (n = 331) and analyzed for their association with LVRm determined by cardiac MRI. Principal components of exRNAs were associated with LVRm phenotypes post-MI; specifically, LV mass, LV ejection fraction, LV end systolic volume index, and fibrosis. We then investigated the temporal regulation and cellular origin of exRNAs in murine and cell models and found that: 1) plasma and tissue miRNA expression was temporally regulated; 2) the majority of the miRNAs were increased acutely in tissue and at sub-acute or chronic time-points in plasma; 3) miRNA expression was cell-specific; and 4) cardiomyocytes release a subset of the identified miRNAs packaged in exosomes into culture media in response to hypoxia/reoxygenation. In conclusion, we find that plasma exRNAs are temporally regulated and are associated with measures of post-MI LVRm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207