Activation reduction following an eccentric contraction impairs torque steadiness in the isometric steady-state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The isometric steady-state following active lengthening is associated with greater torque production and lower activation, as measured by electromyographic activity (EMG), in comparison with a purely isometric contraction (ISO) at the same joint angle. This phenomenon is termed residual force enhancement (RFE). While there has been a great deal of research investigating the basic mechanisms of RFE, little work has been performed to understand the everyday relevance of RFE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether neuromuscular control strategies differ between ISO and RFE by measuring torque steadiness of the human ankle plantar flexors. Following ISO maximal voluntary contractions in 12 males (25 ± 4 years), an active lengthening contraction was performed at 15°/s over a 30° ankle excursion, ending at the same joint angle as ISO (5° dorsiflexion; RFE). Surface EMG of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles was recorded during all tasks. Torque steadiness was determined as the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of the torque trace in the ISO and RFE condition during activation-matching (20% and 60% integrated EMG) and torque-matching (20% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction) experiments. Two-tailed, paired t tests were used, within subjects, to determine the presence of RFE/activation reduction (AR) and whether there was a difference in torque steadiness between ISO and RFE conditions. During the maximal and submaximal conditions, there was 5%–9% RFE with a 9%–11% AR (p < 0.05), respectively, with no difference in antagonist coactivation between RFE and ISO (p > 0.05). There were no differences in SD and CV of the torque trace for the 20% and 60% activation-matching or the 60% and maximal torque-matching trials in either the RFE or ISO condition (p > 0.05). During the 20% torque-matching trial, there were ∼37% higher values for SD and CV in the RFE as compared with the ISO condition (p < 0.05). A significant moderate-to-strong negative relationship was identified between the reduction in torque steadiness following active lengthening and the accompanying AR (p < 0.05). It appears that while the RFE-associated AR provides some improved neuromuscular economy, this comes at the cost of increased torque fluctuations in the isometric steady-state following active lengthening during submaximal contractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".