MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803504285 · doi:10.1142/s2424922x18400065

Deep Learning of EEG Time–Frequency Representations for Identifying Eye States

2018· article· en· W2803504285 on OpenAlexafffund
Dharmendra Gurve, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSpectrogramComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)ElectroencephalographyNon-negative matrix factorizationFeature (linguistics)Brain–computer interfaceFeature extractionTime–frequency analysisSpeech recognitionMatrix decompositionComputer visionPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture to classify nonstationary biomedical signals using their time–frequency representations is proposed. The present method uses the spectrogram of the biomedical signals as an input to CNN, in addition Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) dictionary elements are used as an additional feature to improve the performance of the CNN model. Considering a number of applications involving eye state classification, such as in Parkinson’s disease detection, analysis of eye fatigue in 3D TVs, driver’s drowsiness detection, infant sleep-waking state identification, and classification of bipolar mood disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity, the proposed method was applied to Electroencephalography (EEG) data for classification of eye state. First, the spectrogram of EEG signal is obtained and used as an image input to CNN, simultaneously, the NMF feature is also fed to CNN. Further, both features are combined in fully connected layer of CNN architecture. The proposed method is compared with other existing methods for eye state detection and shows good classification accuracy with 96.16%. The prediction rate for the proposed method is 134 observations/second, which is suitable for brain–computer interface applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Data Science and Adaptive AnalysisSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207