MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803533651 · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2018.04.013

Efficiently computing the electrical parameters of cables with arbitrary cross-sections using the method-of-moments

2018· article· en· W2803533651 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shafieipour, Z. Chen, Anton Menshov, J. De Silva, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Systems Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Hydro
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmittance parametersEmtpDiscretizationMethod of moments (probability theory)Coaxial cableComputationImpedance parametersTransient (computer programming)Electrical impedanceElectric power systemMathematical analysisComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringAlgorithmPower (physics)GeometryVoltagePhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a recent work, a proximity- and skin-effect aware formulation known as the surface-volume-surface electric field integral equation discretized with 2-D method-of-moments (MoM) was optimized to efficiently extract the frequency dependent series impedance matrix of cables with arbitrary shapes. However, it was only applied to sector-shaped and coaxial cables due to the constraints on computing the shunt admittance matrix using closed-form approximations. This work presents formulation, discretization, and optimization techniques, for fast computation of the shunt admittance matrix of arbitrary-shaped cables by discretizing the problem of the quasi-electrostatics using 2-D MoM. With the proposed MoM techniques and optimization strategies, it is possible to accurately compute all the electrical parameters of arbitrary-shaped cables required in electromagnetic transient programs (EMTP) using today's typical computer power and with reasonable computational times. This provides an efficient modeling tool for any desired cable design. Frequency domain solutions of the proposed technique are compared against the finite-element method as well as the classical approximate formulas available for pertinent cable models. The resulting time domain transient simulations in EMTP are also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Systems ResearchSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207