Les salles de cinéma en Inde, un territoire à conquérir : perspectives historiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les recherches sur l’histoire du cinéma en Inde, et en particulier celles sur le cinéma des premiers temps, attestent d’un manque cruel de sources, d’archives et de conservation des films. Comment documenter alors une histoire peu traitée, celle des salles de cinéma, sur un territoire aussi vaste ? Cet article, nullement exhaustif, cherche à mettre en évidence, de façon diachronique, les grands enjeux de l’exploitation en Inde. Des débuts du cinéma jusqu’à nos jours, une problématique de fond persiste : la conquête des zones rurales et de ses publics. À cette opposition entre territoires urbains et territoires ruraux se superpose, en ville, celle de la distinction entre différentes classes de cinémas. Variant dans la forme, ces analyses montrent toutefois une permanence de problèmes structurels, entre pénurie de salles et fortes disparités territoriales. Le déploiement des multiplexes, et de ses avatars en taille réduite, les miniplexes et les valueplexes, semble ouvrir la brèche des potentialités des marchés ruraux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".