MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803571237

New Synthetic Approaches and Structural Models of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex in Photosystem II from the Use of Oximato-Based Ligands

2018· dissertation· en· W2803571237 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alysha A. Alaimo

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock University
KeywordsPhotosystem IIOxygen-evolving complexChemistryComputer scienceOxygenCombinatorial chemistryComputational biologyBiological systemInformation retrievalBiologyBiochemistryPhotosynthesisOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The employment of the chelating/bridging ligands salicylhydroxime (shiH3), quinoline-2-aldoxime (qaoH) and 2,6-diacetylpyridine dioxime (dapdoH2) in heterometallic Mn‒Ca chemistry has afforded various compounds with diverse topologies, metal stoichiometries and Mn oxidation state descriptions. Chapter 1 provides a general introduction to the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) of Photosystem II (PSII) including discussions of fundamental aspects such as composition, structural proposals, mechanism of O‒O bond formation and synthetic approaches. My research results are reported in Chapter 2, 3 and 4. In the first project (Chapter 2), one-pot reactions between Mn(ClO4)2∙6H2O, Ca(ClO4)2∙4H2O and the potentially tetradentate chelating/bridging ligand salicylhydroxime (shiH3), resulting from the in situ metal ion-assisted amide-iminol tautomerism of salicylhydroxamic acid (shaH2), in the presence of various fluorescence carboxylate groups (2-naphthoic acid = L1-H; 9-anthracenecarboxylic acid = L2-H; 1-pyrenecarboxylic acid = L3-H) and base NEt3 has led to a family of structurally similar {MnIII4Ca} clusters (1‒4¬) with distorted square pyramidal topologies. The combined results demonstrate the ability of shiH3 and fluorescence carboxylates to yield new heterometallic Mn‒Ca clusters with (i) the same Mn‒Ca ratio as the OEC of PSII, (ii) structural stability in solution, (iii) a pronounced redox and optical activity and (iv) predominant antiferromagnetic exchange interactions with S = 0 spin ground states. These complexes may be relevant to lower oxidation level species of the catalytic cycle of the OEC. The second project of this thesis, discussed in Chapter 3, involved one-pot reactions between the [Mn3O(O2CPh)6(py)x]+/0 triangular precursors and either CaBr2∙xH2O or CaCl2∙6H2O in the presence of shaH2. This afforded the heterometallic complexes [MnIII4Ca2(O2CPh)4(shi)4(H2O)3(Me2CO)] (5) and (pyH)[MnII2MnIII4Ca2Cl2(O2CPh)7(shi)4(py)4] (6), respectively, in good yields. Further reactions but using a more flexible synthetic scheme comprising the Mn(NO3)2∙4H2O/Ca(NO3)2∙4H2O and Mn(O2CPh)2∙2H2O/Ca(ClO4)2∙4H2O “metal blends” and shaH2 in the presence of external base NEt3, led to the new complexes (NHEt3)[MnIII4MnIV4Ca2(OEt)2(shi)10(EtOH)2] (7) and (NHEt3)4[MnIII8Ca2(CO3)4(shi)8] (8), respectively. Solid-state dc magnetic susceptibility studies of 5‒8 revealed the presence of predominant antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the Mn centers, leading to S = 0 spin ground state values. From a bioinorganic chemistry perspective, these compounds may demonstrate some relevance to both the high-valent scheme (7) and lower oxidation level species (5, 6 and 8) of the catalytic cycle of the OEC. In the last chapter of this thesis (Chapter 4), the ligands quinoline-2-aldoxime (qaoH) and 2,6-diacetylpyridine dioxime (dapdoH2) were introduced for a first time in heterometallic Mn‒Ca chemistry. This afforded a mixed-valence {MnII/III22Ca2} (9) cluster containing several {Mn4CaOx} subunits and a butterfly-like {MnIV2Ca2} (10) complex, respectively. These compounds demonstrate structural and magnetic relevance to both the low- and high-valent states of the OEC. All research-based Chapters (Chapter 2‒4) are divided into subsections in order to facilitate the understanding of the research concepts by the familiar and non-familiar readers and contextualize the messages, goals and conclusions of each individual project. I felt it was appropriate to begin each Chapter with a short preface of the work that summarizes the most important aspects of the specific project, followed by the complete experimental work and discussion of the results, and end with conclusions and some future perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)Same topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207