Optimal Synchronization Control of Multiagent Systems With Input Saturation via Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we aim to investigate the optimal synchronization problem for a group of generic linear systems with input saturation. To seek the optimal controller, Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations involving nonquadratic input energy terms in coupled forms are established. The solutions to these coupled HJB equations are further proven to be optimal and the induced controllers constitute interactive Nash equilibrium. Due to the difficulty to analytically solve HJB equations, especially in coupled forms, and the possible lack of model information of the systems, we apply the data-based off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm to learn the optimal control policies. A byproduct of this off-policy algorithm is shown that it is insensitive to probing noise that is exerted to the system to maintain persistence of excitation condition. In order to implement this off-policy algorithm, we employ actor and critic neural networks to approximate the controllers and the cost functions. Furthermore, the estimated control policies obtained by this presented implementation are proven to converge to the optimal ones under certain conditions. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it