MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803625342 · doi:10.1520/gtj20170152

Experimental and Simple Semiempirical Methods for Interpreting the Axial Load Versus Settlement Behaviors of Single Model Piles in Unsaturated Sands

2018· article· en· W2803625342 on OpenAlex
Sai K. Vanapalli, Mohamadjavad Sheikhtaheri, Won Taek Oh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickAmec Foster Wheeler (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringSettlement (finance)Simple (philosophy)GeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experimental studies were undertaken to investigate the vertical load versus displacement behavior of single model piles in sand (i.e., Unimin 7030 sand) under both saturated and unsaturated conditions. Stainless steel model piles with three different diameters (i.e., 19.25, 31.75, and 38.3 mm) with a length of 350 mm were used to conduct the pile load tests. Semiempirical methods were proposed to successfully predict the variation of end- and shaft-bearing capacities of single piles with respect to matric suction by modifying three conventional end-bearing capacity equations (Terzaghi 1943; Hansen 1970; Janbu 1976) and the β-method (Burland 1973), respectively. In addition, finite element analyses were also carried out to simulate vertical load versus settlement behaviors of model pile tests using a commercial finite element software, SIGMA/W (GeoStudio 2007).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it