A Study of the Forms and Technology of Traditional Granary Buildings in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Fu River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the authors performed field surveys and investigated the formal and technological characteristics of granary buildings in the middle and lower reaches of the Fu River. Their study could help architects understand the regional features of traditional vernacular buildings. Employing field survey and mapping, the authors found that the building styles of traditional granaries are not different from those of traditional residential houses. This type of architecture challenges the restrictions of the ritual system and highlighted structural flexibility and functional priority through the use of beam structure. In the final section of the study, the thermal and wind environments of granary buildings are analyzed using ECOTECT software. The results of the analysis demonstrate that granary buildings can maintain low temperatures and prevent moisture using eco-building techniques, such as ventilative stone ridges, moisture-resistant walls and heat insulation storage rooms. These achievements demonstrate that traditional vernacular buildings, such as granaries, undergo fundamental evolution in architectural form and technology rather than maintaining the original state of a specific historical period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it