MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803738789 · doi:10.1111/jre.12565

The directional and non‐directional associations of periodontitis with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies

2018· review· en· W2803738789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Periodontal Research · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Hong Kong
KeywordsMedicinePeriodontitisCochrane LibraryOdds ratioMeta-analysisCohort studyObservational studyInternal medicinePublication biasIncidence (geometry)Dentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This systematic review aimed to assess the current evidence on the directional and non‐directional associations of periodontitis with chronic kidney disease ( CKD ). Electronic search for observational studies on the association of periodontitis with CKD was performed in MEDLINE , EMBASE , PubMed, Open GREY and Cochrane library up to June 5, 2017. Two reviewers conducted study selection, data collection and assessment of methodological quality using the original and modified Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Cohort, case‐control and cross‐sectional studies were included, which clearly defined periodontitis and CKD or reported acceptable clinical parameters of these 2 diseases in adults. Meta‐analysis was employed to estimate the pooled odds ratio on the non‐directional association and the incidence rate ratio ( IRR ) for the directional association. Among 2530 potential eligible articles, 47 were finally included. Most of them investigated a non‐directional association of periodontitis with CKD , including 7 case‐control studies and 38 cross‐sectional studies; 24 studies had statistical analysis on the non‐directional association and 75% of them reported significant results, which were supported further by the meta‐analysis (random: odds ratio = 2.12, P < .001; χ 2 = 25.74, I 2 = 88.3%). None of the studies focused on the directional association of CKD (as the exposure) with periodontitis (as the outcome), whereas 2 retrospective cohort studies explored a directional association of periodontitis (as the exposure) with CKD (as the outcome) (random: IRR =2.10, P > .05; fixed: IRR =1.76, P < .05; χ 2 = 4.65, I 2 = 78.3%). Overall, the high heterogeneity of studies limits the significance of these results. There is substantial evidence on the non‐directional association of periodontitis with CKD , while there are limited studies on the directional association. Well‐designed prospective studies with longer follow‐ups in representative communities are needed to clarify the directional association and enhance the quality of the evidence on this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.264
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it