MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803866596 · doi:10.4171/jca/39

On the complexity of the cogrowth sequence

2020· preprint· en· W2803866596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Algebra · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlphabetCayley graphSequence (biology)CombinatoricsGenerating set of a groupMathematicsSet (abstract data type)GraphGroup (periodic table)Finitely-generated abelian groupDiscrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a finitely generated group with generating set S , we study the cogrowth sequence, which is the number of words of length n over the alphabet S that are equal to one. This is related to the probability of return for walks in a Cayley graph with steps from S . We prove that the cogrowth sequence is not P -recursive when G is an amenable group of superpolynomial growth, answering a question of Garrabrant and Pak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it