Gastric dilatation volvulus with concurrent peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia in a dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A seven‐year‐old male neutered labrador retriever presented for acute onset of retching, distended abdomen and suspicion of gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV). Physical exam findings were consistent with GDV and included tachycardia and a distended abdomen. Preoperative abdominal radiographs were consistent with GDV, but found a lack of additional abdominal viscera. Radiographic views of the thorax revealed an incidental peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia (PPDH). The patient was immediately taken to surgery for derotation of the stomach, repair of the PPDH and gastropexy. The patient was anorexic postoperatively and remained hospitalised for four days on intravenous fluids, gastric protectants and analgesics, and was then discharged. At 10‐month follow‐up, the patient was doing well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".