MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803885114 · doi:10.3917/agora.079.0067

Rapports des jeunes au travail, pratiques d’emploi et diplômes

2018· article· fr· W2803885114 on OpenAlex
María Eugenia Longo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgora débats/jeunesses · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American socio-political dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis les années 1980, plusieurs études ont montré la différenciation des parcours professionnels. Cette différenciation comporte une composante de singularisation liée aux arbitrages et aux choix des acteurs, qui peut se comprendre à la lumière des rapports à la vie professionnelle. L’analyse de ceux-ci permet à la fois de multiplier les dimensions à considérer – l’activité, le travail, l’emploi, le monde professionnel – et de les réunir sous un même objet, pour porter un regard affiné sur la dimension qui est réellement en jeu et qui opère dans les parcours. De plus, ces dimensions et combinaisons doivent être analysées dans une perspective dynamique. Enfin, ces rapports nous permettent de repérer le diplôme ou l’origine sociale lors de l’orientation d’un cheminement. Les données sont issues d’une recherche qualitative et longitudinale sur les parcours de 84 jeunes femmes et hommes avec et sans diplôme en Argentine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.018
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it