MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803905361 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-1032

ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS FOR INNOVATIVE DESK LAMP CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

2017· article· en· W2803905361 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nien-Te Liu, Chang-Tzuoh Wu, Jia-Cin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeskConceptual designFocus (optics)Functional requirementEngineeringArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceFunctional designSystems engineeringEngineering drawingMechanical engineeringSoftware engineeringOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desk lamp designers tend to focus on the structure of lamps and not consider the option of incorporating new, innovative designs. Creative functional elements and innovative illustrations for desk lamps are proposed in this study. The main creative functional elements are lamp shades, bases, hinges, and pipes. There are three connecting types for these main creative functional elements: the assembled type, the composite type, and the integrated type. These principles are applied to create three creative functional elements and three connecting types that are subsequently used to generate three innovative conceptual designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207