MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803932968 · doi:10.1515/jag-2018-0010

Improving TRANS4D’s model for vertical crustal velocities in Western CONUS

2018· article· en· W2803932968 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Richard A. Snay, J. Saleh, Chris Pearson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Geodesy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsGeologyGeodetic datumLongitudeCalderaGeodesySeismologySubsidenceVolcanoFault (geology)Post-glacial reboundGeomorphologyGlacial periodLatitudeStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The “Transformations in Four Dimensions” (TRANS4D) software was developed to enable geospatial professionals and others to transform 3-D positional coordinates referred to one date to corresponding positional coordinates referred to another date. For this purpose, TRANS4D incorporates 3-D crustal velocity models for most of the United States and Canada. In this report, an improved model for the vertical velocity field of that part of the conterminous United States that resides west of longitude 107°W is introduced. A new estimation process was employed so that this newer velocity field would have a spatial resolution of 0.0625° × 0.0625° in latitude and longitude, whereas the spatial resolution of TRANS4D’s previous model for this area was 0.25° × 0.25°. The realized improvements benefited from the inclusion of repeated geodetic data at approximately 1300 new locations and from the longer time spans of repeated geodetic data at other locations. After removing that part of the current vertical velocity field due to the glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Last Glacial Maximum, features of the remaining vertical velocity field are discussed in terms of ongoing geophysical processes. These processes include subduction in the Pacific Northwest, uplift along the San Andreas Fault System, and subsidence due to groundwater extraction in California’s Central Valley. They also include uplift within both the Yellowstone Caldera and the Long Valley Caldera, uplift near Hebgen Lake in Montana, and subsidence near Lassen Peak Volcano in California.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied GeodesySame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207