MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks

2018· preprint· en· W2803959545 on OpenAlexafffund
Charley Gros, Benjamin De Leener, Atef Badji, Josefina Maranzano, Dominique Eden, Sara M. Dupont, Jason F. Talbott, Ren Zhuoquiong, Yaou Liu, Tobias Granberg, Russell Ouellette, Yasuhiko Tachibana, Masaaki Hori, Kouhei Kamiya, Lydia Chougar, Leszek Stawiarz, Jan Hillert, Élise Bannier, Anne Kerbrat, Gilles Edan, Pierre Labauge, Virginie Callot, Jean Pelletier, Bertrand Audoin, Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina, Jean‐Christophe Brisset, Paola Valsasina, Maria A. Rocca, Massimo Filippi, Rohit Bakshi, Shahamat Tauhid, Ferrán Prados, Marios Yiannakas, Hugh Kearney, Olga Ciccarelli, Seth A. Smith, Constantina A. Treaba, Caterina Mainero, Jennifer Lefeuvre, Daniel S. Reich, Govind Nair, Vincent Auclair, Donald G. McLaren, Allan R. Martin, Michael G. Fehlings, Shahabeddin Vahdat, Ali Khatibi, Julien Doyon, Timothy M. Shepherd, Erik Charlson, Sridar Narayanan, Julien Cohen‐Adad

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Eye InstituteFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyGenentechCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSvenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk ForskningCanada Foundation for InnovationMinistero della SaluteNational Institutes of HealthCanada Research ChairsIntramural Research ProgramAgence Nationale de la RechercheFondation Aix-Marseille UniversiteFondation pour l'Aide à la Recherche sur la Sclérose en PlaquesFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesStockholms Läns LandstingWings for LifeInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesFondazione Italiana Sclerosi MultiplaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesInternational Society of Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBiogenU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiEMD Serono
KeywordsSpinal cordSegmentationMedicineMultiple sclerosisConvolutional neural networkCordLesionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer sciencePathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207