Modeling Effective Anisotropy of Substrate Integrated Dielectric Waveguides for Polarization Diversity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A field-based analytical procedure is presented and developed for accurate modeling of the effective parameters of substrate integrated nonradiative dielectric (SINRD) waveguide. This modeling strategy is based on the eigenmode analysis of a dielectric substrate material perforated with air holes and enclosed between two horizontal metallic plates. From this model, it is found that the resulting effective dielectric constant of the periodic geometry of the SINRD waveguide is dependent on the direction of an electric field vector with respect to the material periodicity. In other words, the guiding parts of the SINRD waveguides act as anisotropic materials. A full demonstration for the proposed analysis is supported with simulation results using a full-wave finite-element method. The proposed model provides a scheme for the isotropization of anisotropic substrates. This is in addition to clarifying the exact regimes of operation inside the SINRD waveguide based on the guiding mechanism. Validation examples are studied based on polarization-selective coupling and effective polarization-independent coupling. A prototype is realized and measured where good agreement is achieved between simulation and measurement results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".