MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804021151 · doi:10.1051/ppsy/2017564372

Caractéristiques du fonctionnement psychique des auteurs de violences conjugales

2017· article· fr· W2804021151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christelle Ferraty-Giacardi, Alexia Delbreil

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives Psy · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La violence conjugale est un enjeu majeur de santé publique en France. Parmi les éléments entrant en ligne de compte dans l’émergence de ce type de violence, apparaissent des facteurs de risque d’ordre biologique, sociaux mais également psychologiques. De nombreuses études scientifiques, en particulier canadiennes, ont mis en évidence une prépondérance d’un attachement de type insécure chez les auteurs de violences conjugales. D’un point de vue plus psychanalytique, ces individus, le plus souvent des hommes, sont souvent confrontés à une dépendance affective vis-à-vis des femmes. La dynamique du passage à l’acte, déclenchée par l’angoisse de perte d’objet et la confrontation au manque, intervient alors dans une tentative de réparer des blessures intérieures non cicatrisées. Si l’on se situe dans cette perspective, la mise en place d’une psychothérapie individuelle axée sur cette problématique peut présenter un intérêt et faire partie intégrante de la prise en charge de ces sujets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives PsySame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207