MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804124589 · doi:10.60082/2817-5069.3267

The Once and Future Liberal, by Mark Lilla

2018· article· en· W2804124589 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael Thorburn

Bibliographic record

VenueOsgoode Hall law journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPopulism, Right-Wing Movements
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryPresidencyDemocracyPolitical scienceLawOddsPoliticsLaw and economicsPolitical economySociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On November 8, 2016 Donald J. Trump was elected President of the United States of America. For most, Trump’s victory was improbable. To others, however, it was predictable. For the leadership of the Democratic Party, Trump’s victory represented a breakdown of the apparatus that helped twice elect Barack Obama to the presidency. On the surface, Trump’s Electoral College victory showcased the inability of the Clinton campaign to overcome a Republican nominee who, by many indications, was unfit for the office he was seeking. But beneath the surface, the 2016 election revealed a Democratic Party at odds with itself—a party without a clear direction or a coherent vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsgoode Hall law journalSame topicPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsFrench-language works237,207