MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804142894 · doi:10.1002/mp.13240

Multiregion segmentation of bladder cancer structures in MRI with progressive dilated convolutional networks

2018· article· en· W2804142894 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationBladder cancerImage segmentationMagnetic resonance imagingConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Medical imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Precise segmentation of bladder walls and tumor regions is an essential step toward noninvasive identification of tumor stage and grade, which is critical for treatment decision and prognosis of patients with bladder cancer (BC). However, the automatic delineation of bladder walls and tumor in magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a challenging task, due to important bladder shape variations, strong intensity inhomogeneity in urine, and very high variability across the population, particularly on tumors' appearance. To tackle these issues, we propose to leverage the representation capacity of deep fully convolutional neural networks. METHODS: The proposed network includes dilated convolutions to increase the receptive field without incurring extra cost or degrading its performance. Furthermore, we introduce progressive dilations in each convolutional block, thereby enabling extensive receptive fields without the need for large dilation rates. The proposed network is evaluated on 3.0T T2-weighted MRI scans from 60 pathologically confirmed patients with BC. RESULTS: Experiments show the proposed model to achieve a higher level of accuracy than state-of-the-art methods, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.98, 0.84, and 0.69 for inner wall, outer wall, and tumor region segmentation, respectively. These results represent a strong agreement with reference contours and an increase in performance compared to existing methods. In addition, inference times are less than a second for a whole three-dimensional (3D) volume, which is between two and three orders of magnitude faster than related state-of-the-art methods for this application. CONCLUSION: We showed that a CNN can yield precise segmentation of bladder walls and tumors in BC patients on MRI. The whole segmentation process is fully automatic and yields results similar to the reference standard, demonstrating the viability of deep learning models for the automatic multiregion segmentation of bladder cancer MRI images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207