MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804237229 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2018.03.0104

Predicting Heavy Metal Partition Equilibrium in Soils: Roles of Soil Components and Binding Sites

2018· article· en· W2804237229 on OpenAlexaff
Shimeng Peng, Pei Wang, Lanfang Peng, Tao Cheng, Weimin Sun, Zhenqing Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryMetalSoil waterOrganic matterEnvironmental chemistryDissolved organic carbonPartition coefficientDenticitySoil organic matterInorganic chemistrySoil scienceGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas WHAM 7 successfully predicted heavy metal partition in various soils. Major soil and solution parameters influenced the accuracy of model predictions. Soil organic matter dominated metal binding at most acidic to neutral pH in soils. WHAM 7 predicted bidentate binding as the dominant form of metal complexes. The reactivity and bioavailability of heavy metals in soils are controlled by their binding to reactive soil components, including soil organic matter (SOM), metal (hydr)oxides, and clay minerals. In this study, we specifically investigated how soil components and SOM binding sites controlled metal partition at various chemistry conditions. We used the Windermere Humic Aqueous Model (WHAM 7) to predict the solid‐solution partition and speciation of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn based on compiled literature data including 98 soil samples from five continents. Based on the root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) values of logarithm of dissolved metal concentrations between model predictions and experimental results, WHAM 7 reasonably predicted metal partition equilibrium over a wide range of reaction conditions, with RMSE less than 0.5 for Cd and Zn, and less than 1.0 for the other three metals. Soil organic matter dominated metal binding at most acidic to neutral pH, clay minerals were significant at low pH, and iron (hydr)oxides might effectively compete with SOM for metal binding when pH was high. For all five heavy metals, WHAM 7 predicted the bidentate bindings were the dominant form of metal complexes, in which both complexes formed by two carboxylic sites and that by one carboxylic and another phenolic sites were major complexes. The formation of monodentate complexes and electrostatic outer‐sphere complexes was significant at low pH, while tridentate complexes were only significant at high pH values. The modeling results help to accurately predict the environmental behavior of heavy metals in pH 3 to 7 soil environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207