Free Functional Muscle Transfer for Thumb Opposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traumatic injuries and other conditions resulting in thenar loss and loss of opposition function can cause significant functional limitations. There are limited options available to restore function and bulk to the thenar musculature. A 26-year-old man had an unfortunate accident at work with a machine mixer creating a crush injury to his left hand. This required several debridements due to the tissue injury and resulted in loss of the thenar muscles and ability to oppose the thumb. He recovered well from the initial injury, however, was left with difficulty with grasp and holding objects due to the loss of thenar motion and strength. His function was also affected by the loss of bulk. He successfully underwent a free functional muscle reconstruction with his serratus anterior. This case report is a description of his reconstruction and a review of the literature. The patient had an excellent outcome. He obtained active opposition and improved grip strength, improving his activities of daily living and vocational life. The serratus anterior muscle can successfully be used for thumb opposition reconstruction. This case report demonstrates good outcomes for both motion and bulk restoration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".