MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804318599 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01135

A Dynamic Heterogeneous Dispersion Model Evaluates Performance of Industrial Catalytic Hydrotreating Systems

2018· article· en· W2804318599 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Azarpour, Sohrab Zendehboudi

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisHydrodesulfurizationProcess engineeringTerephthalic acidPressure dropDispersion (optics)Process (computing)Plug flowMaterials scienceChemistryEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceThermodynamicsEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catalyst deactivation is one of the main challenges in industrial reaction operations. In this paper, a dynamic heterogeneous model is developed for the crude terephthalic acid hydropurification process. The model incorporates the effects of axial mixing and deactivation of the commercial catalyst of palladium supported on carbon on efficiency of the hydropurification operation. The transport phenomena governing equations lead to a series of partial differential equations which are simultaneously solved. The model validation is accomplished using the industrial data. The proposed model satisfactorily simulates the real process, and it is more accurate than the plug flow model to forecast the process behaviors. A decline in the catalyst particle size improves the catalyst performance; an increase in the catalyst porosity prolongs the catalyst lifetime, while maintaining an acceptable pressure drop in the catalyst bed. It is concluded that the effective control of p -xylene oxidation reactor (in terms of process conditions) and inlet temperature rise lead to more efficient purification process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207