MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804334686 · doi:10.17648/rsd-v7i1.100

Gestão de capital de giro: um estudo nas microempresas moveleiras de Divinópolis, MG

2018· article· en· W2804334686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Society and Development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWorking Capital and Financial Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The rapid decline of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.), a keystone species of upper subalpine and treeline elevational zones across many of the higher mountains of the western United States and Canada, has prompted the development of restoration strategies and practical restoration applications. Whitebark pine has been federally listed as ‘threatened’ in the United States, which elevates the restoration imperative. Seeding potentially provides a low-cost means of establishing the species in remote areas with limited access and/or land use constraints, but this restoration tool still lacks sufficient advancement to ensure operational success. We present an overview of whitebark pine ecology, outline the factors leading to its decline, summarize ongoing conservation efforts and restoration strategies, and review the available literature on seeding whitebark pine to identify barriers that challenge successful operationalization. Informing and advancing land management for conservation of whitebark pine will require refining seeding protocols by monitoring and reporting on trials to mitigate the main barriers to this application. Additional research is required to reduce seed pilferage by rodents, improve sowing techniques, identify favorable sowing microsites for improved seeding outcomes, and develop a reliable supply chain for seed resistant to introduced disease.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it