MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804355150 · doi:10.3166/rfg.2018.00217

La RFG fait son cinéma

2018· article· fr· W2804355150 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Philippe Denis

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de gestion · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La RFG fait son cinma N ous sommes en 2018, et qu'ils paraissent loin, dj, les temps pas si anciens 2012, lorsque la RFG tait classe rang 4 Fnege et rang 4 CNRS. Doucement mais srement, la revue tait pousse vers la sortie et donc la pr-retraite scientifique. Une revue de langue franaise, sans ambition internationale donc, quoi cela pouvait-il encore servir ? Sonne, K.O., prte tre descendue des plateaux de sono acadmiques par des revues d'associations plus belles et plus fortes qu'elle, la RFG n'avait plus qu' mditer les chansons d'Alain Souchon. Et se dire que dcidment, dans les arts, les affaires, comme les sciences, il arrive toujours un moment o on a fait son temps. Sauf avoir produit des chefs-d'oeuvres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de gestionSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207