MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804385450 · doi:10.1063/1.5035400

The dependence of Schottky junction (I–V) characteristics on the metal probe size in nano metal–semiconductor contacts

2018· article· en· W2804385450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsSchottky diodeSchottky barrierNanoprobeMaterials scienceMetal–semiconductor junctionSemiconductorOptoelectronicsRectificationDiodeSubstrate (aquarium)Nano-Electrical junctionMetalElectrical contactsNanotechnologyNanoparticleMetallurgyVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the dependence of Schottky junction (I–V) characteristics on the metal contact size in metal–semiconductor (M–S) junctions using different metal nanoprobe sizes. The results show strong dependence of (I–V) characteristics on the nanoprobe size when it is in contact with a semiconductor substrate. The results show the evolution from sub-10 nm reversed Schottky diode behavior to the normal diode behavior at 100 nm. These results also indicate the direct correlation between the electric field at the M–S interface and the Schottky rectification behavior. The effect of the metal contact size on nano-Schottky diode structure is clearly demonstrated, which would help in designing a new type of nano-devices at sub-10 nm scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it