Performance of pre-1970s squat reinforced concrete shear walls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seismic performance of pre-1970s squat reinforced concrete shear walls is assessed with the capacity spectrum method to expose structural deficiencies that arise due to current estimates of seismic demands. The walls are 1/3 scale models of a prototype building, designed and detailed in accordance with the 1965 edition of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC-1965) for four locations, two in high seismic zones in western Canada and two in moderate seismic zones in eastern Canada. Seismic demands for different drifts are evaluated against the spectral capacities of the walls to determine the performance. The seismic demands are based on uniform hazard spectra specified by the NBCC-2015. The calculated effective damping and the spectral capacity of the walls are determined from the force–displacement envelopes of the reverse cyclic responses of the shear walls. In addition, spectral capacities based on experimental and numerical results are used to study the effect of axial load and low-strength reinforcing steel on the performance of the shear walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".