Oral Escherichia coli expressing IL-35 meliorates experimental colitis in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by chronic inflammation of colon. It is commonly believed that the imbalance of immune system and overwhelming production of cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of UC. Recent studies demonstrated that interleukin-35 (IL-35), a key player in the regulation of inflammation, has been identified as potential therapeutic target to treat UC. However, conventional intravenous administration is costly and inconvenient. The present study was designed to establish a novel IL-35 delivery system and investigate its therapeutic effects on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental colitis in mice for the first time. An engineered Escherichia coli ( E. coli/IL - 35 ) expressing IL-35 was constructed. Adult male BALB/c mice randomly got the oral administration of E. coli/IL - 35 , empty plasmid-transformed E. coli ( E. coli0 ) or PBS for treatment following ingestion of 3% DSS solution for 5 days. Normal mice were used as control group. Colonic and splenic tissues were collected on day 10 post-DSS-induction. Clinical signs, disease activity index (DAI), pathological and immunohistological changes, cytokine profiles and cell populations were evaluated. Intragastric administration of E. coli/IL - 35 effectively protected the colitis mice from DSS assimilation including weight loss and colon shortening. Pathological analysis showed significantly lower DAI score and much less intra-colon infiltration of neutrophils and CD3 + cells in the IL-35 treated group. Moreover, E. coli/IL - 35 -treated mice demonstrated much less CD4 + IL-17A + Th17 cells and a higher level of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Tregs in spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes, as well as increased colon and serum level of IL-10 and IL-35 and decreased levels of IL-6. Our study showed that E. coli/IL - 35 as a novel oral IL-35 delivery system alleviated inflammatory damage of colonic tissue in the colitic mice. Genetic therapeutic strategies using engineered E. coli encoding immunoregulatory cytokines may provide a potential approach for the treatment of IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".