MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804429079 · doi:10.1111/jen.12523

An alternative hypothesis explains outbreaks of conifer‐feeding budworms of the genus <i>Choristoneura</i> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Canada

2018· article· en· W2804429079 on OpenAlex
Thomas C. R. White

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Entomology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTortricidaeLepidoptera genitaliaSpruce budwormOutbreakLarvaBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This alternative hypothesis states that forests attacked by spruce budworms are, for most of the time, nutritional deserts. During these periods, endemic populations persist in scattered “refuges” on a few stressed trees, but this situation changes once trees in a forest become over‐mature and start to senesce. Senescence causes protein in their mature needles to break down at an accelerating rate, releasing higher levels of soluble amino acids into the phloem thereby increasing the quality of food for larval budworms. Additional stress such as drought that damages or kills the trees’ feeding roots accelerates this process and further elevates the quality of the food for larvae. All the foliage in the forest then become nutritious enough to support high numbers of budworm larvae so that nearly all the young larvae of moths dispersing from refuges into the surrounding newly stressed trees survive and an outbreak ensues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it