MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804447704 · doi:10.1177/1753495x18772999

Primary hyperaldosteronism presenting as persistent postpartum hypertension: Illustrative case and systematic review

2018· article· en· W2804447704 on OpenAlex
Caitlin Kilmartin, Touhid Opu, Tiina Podymow, Natalie Dayan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperaldosteronismMedicinePostpartum periodPrimary aldosteronismPregnancyObstetricsPediatricsSecondary hypertensionGynecologyAldosteroneInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a case of persistent postpartum hypertension found to be secondary to primary hyperaldosteronism in a woman with a history of recurrent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and associated fetal complications. Our systematic review revealed only 18 cases of primary aldosteronism diagnosed in women with postpartum hypertension, suggesting that this disorder is under-studied in the postpartum period. A review of these cases suggests that women with primary hyperaldosteronism commonly present with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but may only be identified de novo postpartum. However, a high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose primary hyperaldosteronism in the postpartum period, guided by a woman's obstetric history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it