MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804495530 · doi:10.1097/paf.0000000000000401

A New Reference Source for Postmortem Body Measurements and Organ Weights in Neonates and Infants

2018· article· en· W2804495530 on OpenAlexaffabout
Audrey-Ann Marie Evetts, Michael J. Shkrum, Elena Tugaleva

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronerSudden infant death syndromeMedicineSudden deathStressorPediatricsHypoxia (environmental)AutopsyInjury preventionPoison controlEmergency medicineInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reference charts for body and organ measurements of neonates and infants were derived from data on 900 investigations done by the Office of the Chief Coroner for Ontario. The statistical analyses in this new reference source addressed deficiencies in sources currently available to pathologists.The present study also considered whether organ weights differed based on the classification of infant deaths using the original definition of either sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) or sudden unexplained death (SUDS) which considers cases occurring in an unsafe sleeping environment or under adverse socioeconomic conditions. Cases of SUDS for both sexes peaked in 5 to 16 weeks of age. The thymus in the SUDS/SIDS age groups less than 25 weeks weighed more than the control group. Adrenal weights in SUDS cases between 9 and 16 weeks weighed less than SIDS cases. This could mean that deaths in unsafe sleep environments are truly sudden in infants who may have a limited adrenal response to acute hypoxia but have been unaffected by preceding chronic stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & PathologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207