Expériences poétiques d’étudiants en formation initiale en enseignement du français au secondaire québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quel rapport à la poésie les étudiants en formation initiale à l’enseignement du français au secondaire québécois entretiennent-ils? Quelles sont leurs conceptions de la poésie, leur manière de lire un recueil de poésie contemporaine et d’écrire un poème? Nos résultats d’enquêtes montrent le très lourd poids de la tradition scolaire qui pèse sur les étudiants et qui semble les empêcher de se distancier afin d’éviter de reproduire des pratiques plus scolaires qu’expérientielles ou esthétiques. Nous proposons quelques pistes de formation qui leur permettront de vivre des expériences poétiques variées, déstabilisantes, satisfaisantes, fructueuses et complexes afin de les amener à enseigner autrement la poésie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".