MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804515104 · doi:10.7202/1045178ar

L’écriture : ce qu’en disent des élèves de fin de primaire

2018· article· fr· W2804515104 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Didier Colin

Bibliographic record

VenueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWriting and Handwriting Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article présente les résultats d’une enquête sur l’écriture menée en France par questionnaire auprès de 160 élèves de dernière année de primaire (CM2). L’analyse de contenu menée fait apparaitre que les élèves interrogés ont du mal à objectiver ce qu’est l’écriture dans la diversité de ses fonctions. Le primat de la correction sur toutes les autres préoccupations et la peur de faire des erreurs ne facilitent pas leur entrée dans l’écriture. Pour les élèves, la langue posée en termes de maitrise est censée assurer aux scripteurs une réussite instantanée de leurs énoncés. Au vu des objets convoqués dans leurs réponses, les élèves ont construit, au terme de leur scolarité primaire, des conceptions encore peu susceptibles de faciliter leur entrée dans les dimensions spécifiques à l’écriture et partant, dans une littératie étendue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducationSame topicWriting and Handwriting EducationFrench-language works237,207