Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une série de terrains ethnographiques menés Dakar et à Ouagadougou, les logiques d’ascension spirituelle de différentes générations de femmes prêcheuses et les usages sociaux qu’elles font des moyens de communication sont examinés. L’article montre que leur ascension résulte du lien au communautaire. Bien que la logique d’individuation soit mise en exergue, des signes de mise en avant de leur individualité, sans se départir du communautaire, permettent de rendre compte d’un subtil processus d’hybridation entre individualisation et individuation. Cette perspective est aussi analysée à travers certains discours de prêcheuses qui révèlent comment ces dernières naviguent entre différents registres d’agencéité ( compliant agency , pious agency et pious critical agency ) en fonction de leur distanciation, résistance ou acceptation devant les logiques de reproduction sociale, les normes d’ordre religieux et les rapports d’autorité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".