MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804555328 · doi:10.26563/dobras.v11i23.717

Reflexões sobre a profissão de modelo: a categoria do exótico na moda e na Antropologia

2018· article· pt· W2804555328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuedObra[s] – revista da Associação Brasileira de Estudos de Pesquisas em Moda · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCorporeality, Perception, and Education
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar como a categoria do exótico é abordada no campo da moda e nos escritos antropológicos. Inicialmente, procurou-se tratar de questões relativas à profissão de modelo, a construção histórico-social da supervalorização e da padronização corporal e, posteriormente, analisar como o exótico apareceu nesse contexto. A questão racial surgiu atrelada ao termo em evidência nos exemplos dos jovens modelos africanos presentes no campo. Assim, tal conceito nos auxilia a refletir sobre importantes relações de poder existentes nesse universo subscritas por meio da linguagem. Os dados baseiam-se em uma pesquisa etnográfica realizada durante 2012 e 2013 em uma agência de modelos na cidade de Fortaleza (CE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it