MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804558154 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.12.001

Modelling and solving a bi-objective intermodal transport problem of agricultural products

2018· article· en· W2804558154 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Abbassi, Ahmed Elhilali Alaoui, Jaouad Boukachour

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureBusinessAgricultural engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsTransport engineeringEngineeringMathematical optimizationEconomicsMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the past few years, transportation of agricultural products is increasingly becoming a crucial problem in supply chain logistics. In this paper, we present a new mathematical formulation and two solution approaches for an intermodal transportation problem. The proposed bi-objective model is applied to the transportation of agricultural products from Morocco to Europe to minimise both the transportation cost either in the form of uni-modal or intermodal, as well as the maximal overtime to delivery products. The first solution approach is based on a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm improved by a local search heuristic and the second one is the GRASP algorithm (Greedy Randomised Adaptive Search Procedure) with iterated local search heuristics. They are tested on theoretical and real case benchmark instances and compared with the standard NSGA-II. Results are analysed and the efficiency of algorithms is discussed using some performance metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering ComputationsSame topicUrban and Freight Transport LogisticsFrench-language works237,207