MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804566090 · doi:10.58998/jnr2026

Calcareous nannofossils from the Eocene North Atlantic Ocean (IODP Expedition 342 Sites U1403–1411).

2017· article· en· W2804566090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul R. Bown, Cherry Newsam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nannoplankton Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcareousGeologyOceanographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 342 (June-July 2012) cored nine sites and 18 \nholes (Sites U1403-U1411) on the J-Anomaly and the Southeast Newfoundland ridges in the \nNW Atlantic Ocean. These sites recovered sections ranging from Pleistocene to upper Albian, \nbut the expedition particularly focussed on the recovery of expanded Paleogene successions \nwith high quality microfossil preservation. This was achieved by choosing sites with thick \npackages of drift-type sediments on topographic highs that would maximise the preservation of \ncarbonate. The expedition suceeded in recovering middle Eocene to lower Oligocene and upper \nOligocene to lower Miocene high sedimentation rate sediment sequences with very well \npreserved microfossils. Highlights of the expedition include the recovery of continuous \nEocene/Oligocene and Oligocene/Miocene boundaries, a Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary \nsection with intact spherule layer, and Cenomanian/Turonian section with a 44 cm black shale. \nHere, we describe notable aspects of the Eocene nannofossil record, including the exceptional \npreservation and the evolution of several important Eocene groups: Nannotetrina, the \nSphenolithus furcatolithoides group, the Reticulofenestra bisecta group and the Coccolithus \ngigas group. We also present a taxonomic overview of the Eocene nannofossil assemblages \nfrom Sites U1403-1411, illustrating 164 taxa and describing 25 new species (Blackites \nfriedrichii, Blackites sextonii, Blackites subtilis, Calcidiscus scullyae, Clausicoccus norrisii, \nCoccolithus hulliae, Coccolithus opdykei, Cruciplacolithus nishii, Helicosphaera prolixa, \nHolodiscolithus agniniae, Holodiscolithus lippertii, Holodiscolithus liuii, Holodiscolithus \nwhitesideae, Nannotetrina plana, Nannotetrina ruda, Neococcolithes purus, Neococcolithes \nradiatus, Pontosphaera brinkhuisii, Pontosphaera hollisii, Pontosphaera romansii, \nPontosphaera wilsonii, Reticulofenestra magniscutum, Scyphosphaera interstincta, \nSemihololithus pseudobiskayae, Syracosphaera octiforma) and five new combinations \n(Blackites inversus, Pontosphaera zigzag, Reticulofenestra erbae, Reticulofenestra isabellae, \nUmbilicosphaera elliptica).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nannoplankton ResearchSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207