Introduction aux mémoires sur le renouvellement de la politique culturelle du Québec (2016)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En ouverture du dossier spécial de la revue Archives , l’auteure présente les consultations publiques tenues en 2016 par le ministère de la Culture et des Communications (MCC) sur le renouvellement de la politique culturelle québécoise. Les mémoires publiés par la revue, celui de l’Association des archivistes du Québec (AAQ), celui des associations d’archives religieuses – le Comité des archives du Conseil du patrimoine religieux du Québec (CPRQ), Regroupement des archivistes religieux du Québec (RAR) et la Table de concertation des archives religieuses de la région de Montréal (TCARM) – ainsi que celui de l’Église catholique de Québec, témoignent de la mobilisation du milieu en faveur des archives lors de ces consultations. Malgré cela, les archives sont peu présentes dans le projet de nouvelle politique du MCC. L’auteure appelle les archivistes à l’action pour redonner aux archives leur importance dans la culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it