Peau rouge, masques blancs : Contre la politique coloniale de reconnaissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le paradigme hegelien de la reconnaissance, admirablement critique par Frantz Fanon dans l’œuvre phare a laquelle ce livre rend hommage, est aujourd’hui evoque, sous sa forme liberale, dans les debats entourant l’autodetermination des peuples colonises, notamment les peuples autochtones d’Amerique du Nord. Politologue et militant, membre de la Nation denee du Nord-Ouest du Canada, l’auteur reprend ici la critique fanonienne et demontre en quoi cette reconnaissance ne fait que consolider la domination coloniale. Cet ouvrage de theorie politique engagee appelle a rebâtir et redeployer les pratiques culturelles des peuples colonises sur la base de l’autoreconnaissance, seule voie vers une reelle decolonisation. Penseur marxiste, Coulthard sait que le marxisme ne peut s’appliquer tel quel a la lutte des Autochtones, mais il en souligne la contribution potentielle et signe ici un veritable traite de combat decolonial et anticapitaliste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".