The effect of educational methods on creativity of pre-school children: A case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the educational method so-called "Ban Ben Bon" on language learning and creativity of pre-school children.The study was a semi-experimental one and its statistical population included 198 children studying in the preschools of Shiraz, Iran.The sample group consisted of 30 preschool children which were selected randomly.The research tool included Torrance test of creative thinking and function test including 11 questions for measuring the reading skill in preschool children.There were five preschools in Golestan town and six children were selected randomly from each five preschools.The children were asked to answer the questions of the function test, and the educating method of Ban Ben Bon was used for educating them.The results show that the educating method of Ban Ben Bon had significant effect on language learning and reading but it had insignificant effect on the creativity of preschool children.Based on statistical analysis and hypothesis testing, it was found that among four elements of creativity, including flexibility, innovation, expansion and fluidity, the method just had a significant effect on innovation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".