MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804744313 · doi:10.3917/lcdm.030.0019

La France peut-elle compter sur l’Allemagne en cas de besoin de projection de force ?

2018· article· fr· W2804744313 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Borzillo

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Champs de Mars · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for International Peace and Security
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L'objectif de l'article basé sur des entretiens et de l'observation participante (au sein de la commission défense du Bundestag ) est de mettre en lumière la fragilité des engagements allemands à venir en termes de participation à des opérations extérieures à travers l'analyse du processus d'élaboration du Livre blanc de la défense de 2016. L'étude de celui-ci met en exergue l'influence des institutions formelles et informelles dans la politique de défense allemande, et minore les attentes vis-à-vis de Berlin en cas de besoin de projection de force à court/moyen terme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Champs de MarsSame topicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military StrategiesFrench-language works237,207