MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804753334 · doi:10.1029/2017ja025123

Poloidal Mode Wave‐Particle Interactions Inferred From Van Allen Probes and CARISMA Ground‐Based Observations

2018· article· en· W2804753334 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Wang, R. Rankin, Y. Wang, Qiugang Zong, Xu‐Zhi Zhou, Kazue Takahashi, R. Marchand, A. W. Degeling

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsFlux (metallurgy)SpacecraftIonComputational physicsResonance (particle physics)EquatorPitch angleMode (computer interface)Atomic physicsEnergy fluxGeophysicsLatitudeMaterials scienceAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ultralow‐frequency wave and test particle models are used to investigate the pitch angle and energy dependence of ion differential fluxes measured by the Van Allen Probes spacecraft on 6 October 2012. Analysis of the satellite data reveals modulations in differential flux resulting from drift resonance between H + ions and fundamental mode poloidal Alfvén waves detected near the magnetic equator at L ∼ 5.7. Results obtained from simulations reproduce important features of the observations, including a substantial enhancement of the differential flux between ∼20 and 40° pitch angle for ion energies between ∼90 and 220 keV and an absence of flux modulations at 90°. The numerical results confirm predictions of drift‐bounce resonance theory and show good quantitative agreement with observations of modulations in differential flux produced by ultralow‐frequency waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207