MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804758477 · doi:10.1515/mcma-2018-0010

Bayesian estimation of ordinary differential equation models when the likelihood has multiple local modes

2018· article· en· W2804758477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMonte Carlo Methods and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOdeOrdinary differential equationLikelihood functionApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationFunction (biology)MathematicsBayesian probabilityEstimation theoryComputer scienceDifferential equationAlgorithmStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are popularly used to model complex dynamic systems by scientists; however, the parameters in ODE models are often unknown and have to be inferred from noisy measurements of the dynamic system. One conventional method is to maximize the likelihood function, but the likelihood function often has many local modes due to the complexity of ODEs, which makes the optimizing algorithm be vulnerable to trap in local modes. In this paper, we solve the global optimization issue of ODE parameters with the help of the Stochastic Approximation Monte Carlo (SAMC) algorithm which is shown to be self-adjusted and escape efficiently from the “local-trapping” problem. Our simulation studies indicate that the SAMC method is a powerful tool to estimate ODE parameters globally. The efficiency of SAMC method is demonstrated by estimating a predator-prey ODEs model from real experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it