Creating biobanks in low and middle-income countries to improve knowledge – The PREPARE initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Millennium Development Goal 5, a project signed in 2000, intended to improve maternal health and reduce maternal mortality by 75% by 2015. Despite all efforts, little progress has been achieved in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) and 99% of all maternal deaths related to pre-eclampsia (PE) still occur in these settings. It is important to determine whether women in LMIC, where PE carries a greater risk than in high-income countries (HIC), have unique risk factors. Some variances may alter the risk, severity and pertinent pathophysiology of PE. We posit based upon this, that women from LMIC may have biomarkers specific to this population. Discovering such specific biomarkers and testing the relevance of biomarkers developed in high-income populations could increase the clinical usefulness of these analyses without increasing cost-effective approaches for prediction of PE. Here we briefly describe our platform to develop the PREPARE - Biobank in tertiary hospitals or basic units for antenatal care from 6 different cities in Brazil. The PREPARE - Biobank has been developed with two arms. The first arm is a cross-sectional study that will collect clinical information and biosamples from more than 1000 women who developed preterm PE. The second arm is a cohort study of 7000 women. It will collect clinical information and longitudinal biosamples from women at three times during pregnancy, <16 weeks, between 28 and 32 weeks and at delivery or diagnosis of adverse outcomes. The biobank will be supported and complemented by a Brazilian database using the CoLab COLLECT Database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.062 | 0.075 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".